Macrophyletic trees of east Asian languages re examined.
Ostapirat, Weera
Macrophyletic trees of east Asian languages re examined. Weera Ostapirat - Osaka-JP : National Museum Ethnology, 2018. - páginas 107-121: ilustraciones en blanco y negro. - no. 98 (2018) - Senri Ethnological Studies ; no. 98 . - National Museum of Ethnology Osaka. .
This paper re-examines the linguistic relationship among the five major language stocks of East Asia: Sino-Tibetan, Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Kra-Dai, and Miao-Yao. Various issues related to current macrophyletic proposals can be traced back to the influential hypotheses of the past century, namely, the Indo-Chinese hypothesis, Austric, and Austro-Tai. Discussions focused on the relationship between Tai and Chinese, between Tai and Austronesian, and on the position of Miao-Yao with respect to Sino-Tibetan and Austroasiatic. Basic vocabulary lists are adapted to test the competing hypotheses and to justify genetic versus contact relationships.
GRUPOS LINGUISTICOS SINO TIBETANO AUSTRONESIO KRA-DAI MIAO-YAO
Macrophyletic trees of east Asian languages re examined. Weera Ostapirat - Osaka-JP : National Museum Ethnology, 2018. - páginas 107-121: ilustraciones en blanco y negro. - no. 98 (2018) - Senri Ethnological Studies ; no. 98 . - National Museum of Ethnology Osaka. .
This paper re-examines the linguistic relationship among the five major language stocks of East Asia: Sino-Tibetan, Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Kra-Dai, and Miao-Yao. Various issues related to current macrophyletic proposals can be traced back to the influential hypotheses of the past century, namely, the Indo-Chinese hypothesis, Austric, and Austro-Tai. Discussions focused on the relationship between Tai and Chinese, between Tai and Austronesian, and on the position of Miao-Yao with respect to Sino-Tibetan and Austroasiatic. Basic vocabulary lists are adapted to test the competing hypotheses and to justify genetic versus contact relationships.
GRUPOS LINGUISTICOS SINO TIBETANO AUSTRONESIO KRA-DAI MIAO-YAO
