A comment on nomenclature in faunal studies. Sandra L. Olsen
Tipo de material:
ArtículoIdioma: Inglés Series American Antiquity. Journal of the Society for American Archaeology ; no.1Detalles de publicación: Estados Unidos-US : Society for American Archaeology, 1981Descripción: páginas 192-194: ilustraciones blanco y negroTema(s): FAUNA | ARQUEOLOGIA | ZOOLOGIA
En: Society for American Archaeology American Antiquity. Journal of the Society for American ArchaeologyResumen: The study of faunal remains from archaeological sites has been described using a variety of terms including: zooarchaeology, archaeozoology, osteoarchaeology, and ethnozoology. With such a broad spectrum of terms in current usage, we feel that the contradictions and errors inherent in somo of this nomenclature need to be corrected. We prefer the term zooarchaeology as a contradiction of the word soologico archaeology proposed by Lubbock in 1865, to define the study of animal remains from archaeological sites and their relationship to humans.
| Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura | Copia número | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Publicaciones Periodicas Extranjeras
|
Museo Nacional de Etnografía y Folklore Centro de procesamiento | REV | E/ AME-ANT/ vol.46(1)/ Jan.1981 | 1 | Disponible | HEMREV005119 |
The study of faunal remains from archaeological sites has been described using a variety of terms including: zooarchaeology, archaeozoology, osteoarchaeology, and ethnozoology. With such a broad spectrum of terms in current usage, we feel that the contradictions and errors inherent in somo of this nomenclature need to be corrected. We prefer the term zooarchaeology as a contradiction of the word soologico archaeology proposed by Lubbock in 1865, to define the study of animal remains from archaeological sites and their relationship to humans.
Haga clic en una imagen para verla en el visor de imágenes
No hay comentarios en este titulo.