The law of the sea treaty and underwater cultural resources. David R. Watters
Tipo de material: ArtículoIdioma: Inglés Series no.3 | Soociety for American Archaeology ; Detalles de publicación: Estados Unidos-US : Society for American Archaeology, 1983.Descripción: páginas 806-816: ilustraciones en blanco y negroTema(s): En: Society for American Archaeology American Antiquity. Journal of the Society for American ArchaeologyResumen: The convention on the Law of the Sea, the culminating document of the third united nations conference on the law of the sea, received favorable votes from 130 states in april 1982. The United States voted against approval. Articles 149 and 303, which address archaeological and historical objects found in various ocean zones, are compromise measures with ambigous texts that are subject to interpretation. Archaeologists generally, not simply underwater archaeologists, should be concerned with these provisions because they could set an unfortunate precedent for future international negotiations involving cultural resources, and because they may apply to inundated prehistoric sites as well as to shipwrecks. Existencias: 1Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura topográfica | Info Vol | Copia número | Estado | Código de barras | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Publicaciones Periodicas Extranjeras | Museo Nacional de Etnografía y Folklore Centro de procesamiento | Revistas | E/ AMER-ANT/ vol.48(4)/ Oct.1983 | no. 4 | 1 | Disponible | HEMREV035262 |
The convention on the Law of the Sea, the culminating document of the third united nations conference on the law of the sea, received favorable votes from 130 states in april 1982. The United States voted against approval. Articles 149 and 303, which address archaeological and historical objects found in various ocean zones, are compromise measures with ambigous texts that are subject to interpretation. Archaeologists generally, not simply underwater archaeologists, should be concerned with these provisions because they could set an unfortunate precedent for future international negotiations involving cultural resources, and because they may apply to inundated prehistoric sites as well as to shipwrecks.
No hay comentarios en este titulo.