000			01922nab a2200325 4500
001			MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091235
003			BO-LP-MUSEF
005			20230612122020.0
008			230612b1982 us ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aBO-LpMNE
041			_aeng
092			_sE _aAMER-ANT/vol.47(4)/ Oct.1982
100	1		_aLeone, Mark P.
245			_aSome opinions about recovering mind. _bMark P. Leone
260			_aEstados Unidos-US : _bSociety for American Archaeology, _c1982.
300			_a742-760 páginas.
310			_aTrimestral
362			_avol.47; n.4 (Oct.1982)
490			_3American Antiquity. Journal of the Society for American Archaeology ; _ano.4
520			_aArchaeologists have tried to reconstruct patterns of thought meaning, and ideas, using, theories of structuralism, cognition and ideology. Case studies involving each of the theories are described, and the strengths and weakness of their application to archaeological data are presented. Structuralism is found to yield substantial examples with well worked treatments of archaeological data. These examples tend to ignore economic context, however, materilism, especially neo marxism, contains thorough definitions of ideology that may be useful to archaeology because they preserve economic context. However such definitions are new to the field and presently offer few well worked examples of how to handle archaeological data.
653			_aMATERIALISMO
653			_aMARXISMO
653			_aARQUEOLOGIA
773	0		_0302653 _976730 _aSociety for American Archaeology _dEstados Unidos-US : Society for American Archaeology, 1982. _oHEMREV012692 _tAmerican Antiquity. Journal of the Society for American Archaeology; _w(BO-LP-MUSEF)MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091233
810			_aSoociety for American Archaeology.
850			_aBO-LpMNE
866			_a1
942			_2ddc _cPPE _dCON _j011
999			_c302655