000 02846nab a2200313 4500
001 MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091712
003 BO-LP-MUSEF
005 20240102105925.0
008 231227b2016 ja ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aBO-LpMNE
041 _aeng
092 _sE
_aSEN-ETH-S(94)/2016
100 1 _aForline, Louis C.
245 _aCaught in the web, but still in the past: Foraging, Farming and Socioeconomic Relations between the Awá-Guajá and their Neighbors.
_cLouis C. Forline
260 _aOsaka-JP :
_bNational Museum Ethnology,
_c2016.
300 _apáginas 227-253:
_bilustraciones en blanco y negro.
362 _ano. 94 (2016)
490 _aSenri Ethnological Studies ;
_vno. 94
520 _aExamining Amazonia in hindsight and evaluating recent evidence reveals rich and complex past that demonstrates a unique dynamic between fonigers and farmers. As relations are played out between these groups a number of scenarios unfold. Both parties may be engaged in relations of friendly exchange, tenuous alliances, hostility, or in recent times, forced merger or separation by mainstream society. Similarly, it also becomes difficult to discern differences between foragers and farmers as both include varying degrees of hunting, farming, fishing and gathering. Recently, studies in historical ecology, archaeology, ethnohistory and linguistics help reconstruct a past that explains the present in forager-farmer relations. In this article, the author examines these questions among the Awa-Guaja of the Brazilian Amazon and how they have engaged with their neighbors, the Ka'apor and Tenetehara. The Awa-Guaja came into permanent contact with Brazilian national society in 1973, and were settled into four semi-nucleated communities by Brazil's Indian Service (FUNAI). As the Awa-Guajá are transitioning to a settled, farming mode of subsistence, there has emerged a compression of evolutionary time as contact has intensified the use of resources, engagements with horticultural groups, and mainstream players. Regional development and lumber activities have also impinged on these groups, inducing a number of individuals to participate in illicit activities. The paper is concluded by examining how each of the four Awa-Guajá communities has embraced contact, by providing a narrative of their experiences and their involvement with different interlocutors.
653 _aANTROPOLOGIA
653 _aCAZADORES-RECOLECTORES
653 _aAWA GUAJA
773 0 _0304294
_977737
_aNational Museum of Ethnology
_dOsaka-JP : National Museum Ethnology, 2016.
_oHEMREV029150
_tSenri Ethnological Studies ;
_w(BO-LP-MUSEF)MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091701
810 _aNational Museum of Ethnology Osaka.
850 _aBO-LpMNE
866 _a1
942 _2ddc
_cPPE
_dCON
_j011
999 _c304351