000			02254nab a2200313 4500
001			MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091718
003			BO-LP-MUSEF
005			20240102151447.0
008			240102b2018 ja ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aBO-LpMNE
041			_aeng
092			_sE _aSEN-ETH-S(98)/2018
100	1		_aWichmann, Soren
245			_aJackknifing the black sheep: ASJP classification performance and Austronesian. _cSoren Wichmann
260			_aOsaka-JP : _bNational Museum Ethnology, _c2018.
300			_apáginas 39-58: _bilustraciones en blanco y negro.
362			_ano. 98 (2018)
490			_aSenri Ethnological Studies ; _vno. 98
520			_aThe performance of the Automated Similarity Judgment Program (ASJP) method of language classification has been tested quantitatively across the world's language families, as well as through more detailed, qualitative inspections of ASJP trees, comparing them with classifications of individual families by experts. Different quantitative performance evaluations all point to a relatively poor overall performance in the case of Austronesian. In order to investigate why Austronesian appears to be so recalcitrant, we identify the individual Austronesian language groups that are responsible for the discrepancies between ASJP and expert classifications-the 'black sheep' of the family-using a simple technique called jackknifing. It turns out that many of the languages which induce a poor fit between the expert and ASJP classifications belong to subgroups of Austronesian that are problematic in various ways. Thus, inaccuracies in the experts' classification of Austronesian must, at least partly, be responsible for the added amount of error in the ASJP classification when it comes to Austronesian.
653			_aANTROPOLOGIA
653			_aLINGUISTICA
653			_aLENGUAS AUSTRONESIAS
773	0		_0304354 _977811 _aNational Museum of Ethnology _dOsaka-JP : National Museum Ethnology, 2018. _oHEMREV035277 _tSenri Ethnological Studies ; _w(BO-LP-MUSEF)MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091715
810			_aNational Museum of Ethnology Osaka.
850			_aBO-LpMNE
866			_a1
942			_2ddc _cPPE _dCON _j011
999			_c304357