000			01800nab a2200337 4500
001			MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091721
003			BO-LP-MUSEF
005			20240102155531.0
008			240102b2018 ja ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aBO-LpMNE
041			_aeng
092			_sE _aSEN-ETH-S(98)/2018
100	1		_aOstapirat, Weera
245			_aMacrophyletic trees of east Asian languages re examined. _cWeera Ostapirat
260			_aOsaka-JP : _bNational Museum Ethnology, _c2018.
300			_apáginas 107-121: _bilustraciones en blanco y negro.
362			_ano. 98 (2018)
490			_aSenri Ethnological Studies ; _vno. 98
520			_aThis paper re-examines the linguistic relationship among the five major language stocks of East Asia: Sino-Tibetan, Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Kra-Dai, and Miao-Yao. Various issues related to current macrophyletic proposals can be traced back to the influential hypotheses of the past century, namely, the Indo-Chinese hypothesis, Austric, and Austro-Tai. Discussions focused on the relationship between Tai and Chinese, between Tai and Austronesian, and on the position of Miao-Yao with respect to Sino-Tibetan and Austroasiatic. Basic vocabulary lists are adapted to test the competing hypotheses and to justify genetic versus contact relationships.
653			_aGRUPOS LINGUISTICOS
653			_aSINO TIBETANO
653			_aAUSTRONESIO
653			_aKRA-DAI
653			_aMIAO-YAO
773	0		_0304354 _977811 _aNational Museum of Ethnology _dOsaka-JP : National Museum Ethnology, 2018. _oHEMREV035277 _tSenri Ethnological Studies ; _w(BO-LP-MUSEF)MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091715
810			_aNational Museum of Ethnology Osaka.
850			_aBO-LpMNE
866			_a1
942			_2ddc _cPPE _dCON _j011
999			_c304360