000 02901nab a2200349 4500
001 MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091762
003 BO-LP-MUSEF
005 20240513110326.0
008 240513b2019 ja ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aBO-LpMNE
041 _aeng
092 _sE
_aSEN-ETH-S(101)/2019
100 1 _aTsay, Jane
245 _aA longitudinal study of Communicative efficiency in Taiwan sign language and Mandarin.
_cJane Tsay
260 _aOsaka-JP :
_bNational Museum Ethnology,
_c2019.
300 _apáginas 133-145:
_bilustraciones en blanco negro.
310 _aIrregular
362 _ano. 101 (2019)
490 _aSenri Ethnological Studies ;
_vno. 101
520 _aBellugi and Fischer (1972) studied the rate of articulation in sign and speech and found that the rate of words per second was higher for spoken English than for American Sign Language. However, a proposition took about the same amount of time to produce in either sign or speech. Myers et al. (2011) conducted a follow up study with an explicit quantification method for measuring communicative efficiency in sign and speech. They proposed that communicative efficiency should be addressed both as representation efficiency (propositions per syllable) and as transmission efficiency (propositions per second). Following Myers et al. (2011), this study investigates communicative efficiency in sign and speech with a focus on changes over time. Narratives from TSL signers and Mandarin speakers were elicited using a picture story book. Comparing the data collected in 2005 and 2015 from the same participants, Taiwan Sign Language showed a slight increase in both transmission efficiency and representation efficiency after ten years, while Mandarin had a slight decrease in transmission efficiency and no change in representation efficiency. Statistical analysis showed that Taiwan Sign Language changed significantly more than Mandarin overall, but the difference in the direction of change across languages did not quite reach statistical significance. Since all participants were middle-aged throughout the duration of the study (maximum age was 53 for the Taiwan Sign Language group and 50 for the Mandarin group), the weak longitudinal effect is not surprising. A study with elderly participants (over 65) is needed to further explore the effect of aging on communicative efficiency.
653 _aLENGUAJES SIMBOLICOS
653 _aFONOLOGIA
653 _aSIGNOS Y SIMBOLOS
700 _aMyers, James
700 _aTai, James
773 0 _0304922
_978168
_aNational Museum of Ethnology
_dOsaka-JP : National Museum Ethnology, 2019.
_oHEMREV035354
_tSenri Ethnological Studies ;
_w(BO-LP-MUSEF)MUSEF-HEM-PPE-091754
810 _aNational Museum of Ethnology Osaka.
850 _aBO-LpMNE
866 _a1
942 _2ddc
_cPPE
_dCON
_j011
999 _c305031